Apache2 ... 2.2.9 is not outdated .... ??

[Mark Hattam]

On 9 Nov 2008, at 19:17, nox wrote:

> Le 9 nov. 08 à 19:44, Mark Hattam a écrit :
>
>> I have Apache2 2.2.9 installed and active
>>
>> The following ports are currently installed:
>> apache2 @2.2.9_1+darwin_9 (active)
>>
>> I've done a sudo port selfupdate ... and then a sudo port  
>> outdated ...
>>
>> The MacPorts installation is not outdated and so was not updated
>> selfupdate done!
>> iMac:~ mark$ sudo port outdated
>> No installed ports are outdated.
>>
>> I can see the sudo port info apache2 says 2.2.10 ...
>>
>> iMac:~ mark$ sudo port info apache2
>> apache2 2.2.10, www/apache2 (Variants: universal, darwin, darwin_7,  
>> darwin_9, openbsd, openldap, preforkmpm, workermpm, eventmpm,  
>> no_startupitem)
>>
>> ... so why is it not "outdated"?
>>
>>
>> Mark
>
> `port info` fetches information from the Portfile whereas `port  
> upgrade` (and `port outdated`) iterates through the PortIndex to  
> determine which ports need to be upgraded.
>
> PortIndex has not been rebuilt yet since I've updated the apache2  
> Portfile so port doesn't know that it is outdated.
>
> Either wait for PortIndex to be rebuilt or run:
> 	sudo port unload apache2
> 	sudo port deactivate apache2
> 	sudo port install apache2 +whatever_variant_you_want_to_enable
>
> Regards,
> Anthony Ramine.

Merci, Anthony.

Ah Ok .. so I have to wait and do another "selfupdate" after the  
PortIndex is modified on the rsync server.

Mark