perl ports overwriting files, so need -f?

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Sep 12, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I'm just saying that this can be a bug.

Except that you say it as a blanket statement even though you've been  
shown at least one case where the port requires the newer version (svk).

I agree that sometimes a maintainer might mistakenly add an  
unnecessary dependency, and it's good to get those things fixed (and I  
do appreciate it when you or anyone files bugs to that effect).

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20080915/01d23578/attachment.bin