n.oxyde at gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 13:34:23 PDT 2009
Why is that overkill? I thought the ultimate goal of MacPorts was
binary packages. Binary packages won't need the *proto packages. I
think we should not move these to lib deps.
Le 19 juin 09 à 19:44, Jeremy Huddleston a écrit :
> They *were* build deps, but they were moved into lib deps. This is
> because too many ports need them to build, and adding build deps for
> all those X11 protocol headers in each port that needs them was
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 08:14, Thomas De Contes wrote:
>> Le 19 juin 09 à 03:40, Perry Lee a écrit :
>>> On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Thomas De Contes wrote:
>>>> thanks to port_cutleaves, i uninstalled all ports that i didn't
>>>> need :-)
>>>> and today, doing "port -u upgrade outdated", it reinstalls them :-/
>>>> port_cutleaves still find them as "leaves"
>>> I'd guess those are build dependencies rather than library
>> so why uninstall them, since i'll need it later ?
>> Téléassistance / Télémaintenance
>> macports-users mailing list
>> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
> macports-users mailing list
> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
More information about the macports-users