Will binaries built in 10.6 still run in 10.5?
Harry van der Wolf
hvdwolf at gmail.com
Mon Oct 4 11:39:43 PDT 2010
2010/10/4 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc at arcor.de>
> On 10/04/2010 09:07 PM, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On 10/3/10 21:21 , Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> Thanks, Ryan. I suppose I will need to find someone who has a 10.5
>>> installation to do a sanity check for me before I release any binaries
>>> tagged with "OS X 10.5 and newer".
>> Distributing binaries built via MacPorts tends to be a bad idea: not only
>> do you need to make sure to distribute the files from any dependencies as
>> well as your binary, but the result will likely interfere with an
>> MacPorts or Fink on the installer's machine.
> I link the *.a static libs into my executable and then test if it works.
> Then I do a "mv /opt/local /opt/local_disable" and test again. It works :)
> Though only for Intel. The PPC code crashes at some point (regardless of
> the presence of /opt/local).
Did you check all libraries/binaries for their architecture with lipo -info
GCC 4.2.1 is designed to build ppc64 for ppc architecture. I assume that
part of your libs/bins is ppc64 instead of ppc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the macports-users