Trying to install ld64 port from source, but binaries installed instead?

[Tim Stowell]

Thanks for the response, the -s option worked fine. The binary on your
server works great, I was just wanting to cross compile the sources for
Windows via mingw, but got stuck, however I did find someone who managed to
get the windows binaries compiled at
http://code.google.com/p/mingw-and-ndk/downloads/detail?name=multiarch-darwin11-cctools127.2-gcc42-5666.3-llvmgcc42-2336.1-Linux-120501.7z&can=2&q=
so in the future I'll probably use that.

-Tim

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sean Farley
<sean.michael.farley at gmail.com>wrote:

> > Right. We never really announced the availability of binaries, but
> they've been available for Snow Leopard since last year and Lion since this
> year.
> >
> > Is there a reason why you want to build ld64 from source -- is there
> something wrong with the binary on our server? If so, we need to know so we
> can fix it.
>
> I can't speak for Tim, but I've pointed out that at the very least the
> gmp binary is wrong on the macport server:
>
> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2012-May/019098.html
>
> I'm not sure if ld64 is a root cause of this or not but this gmp issue
> is one major wrench for distributing gcc compilers (not to mention the
> missing .dSYM) files.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20120510/250b1f3b/attachment.html>