ffmpeg fails to build against ???
LLLActive at GMX.Net
LLLActive at GMX.Net
Tue Jan 29 13:23:30 PST 2013
On 29.01.13 19:38, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:21 PM, LLLActive at GMX.Net <LLLActive at gmx.net
> <mailto:LLLActive at gmx.net>> wrote:
>
> Pardon, there was nolog file after the clean. It was the logfile
> with the error build of ffmpeg. I can not get "sudo port upgrade
> outdated" to run.
>
>
> Right, after the clean you have to try the build again; the point is
> we need the log starting *from* a clean build, because if you just run
> the build again without cleaning, it will skip past everything it
> thinks succeeded. We need to see a full, from the beginning, build log.
>
> As for port upgrade outdated, I guess what I said before made no sense
> to you? I'm not sure how to explain it... if there's nothing to
> upgrade, it's not going to do anything except complain that there are
> no outdated ports to upgrade.
>
Ok, I get it then that the following means all is OK, even if the
"Error: No ports matched the given expression" is a little confusing. :-/
MM:~ MM$ sudo port selfupdate
---> Updating MacPorts base sources using rsync
MacPorts base version 2.1.2 installed,
MacPorts base version 2.1.2 downloaded.
---> Updating the ports tree
---> MacPorts base is already the latest version
The ports tree has been updated. To upgrade your installed ports, you
should run
port upgrade outdated
MM:~ MM$ sudo port upgrade outdated
Error: No ports matched the given expression = All OK then, nothing to
upgrade then.
Thanks for the info.
:-)
Dreiel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20130129/d053dc27/attachment.html>
More information about the macports-users
mailing list