libgcc update ... to 4.9? (and of binary packages and MacPorts install locations)

Daniel J. Luke dluke at geeklair.net
Wed Aug 20 06:47:28 PDT 2014


On Aug 20, 2014, at 5:02 AM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Is it possible that with the latest selfupdate, changes were included to the sandboxing mechanism that further interfere with the possibility/transparence of having /opt/local be a symlink to MacPort's true location? 

I have a MacPorts installation that uses an /opt/local symlink and it doesn't have a problem getting/using binaries.
--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
+========================================================+                        
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |                          
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                          
+========================================================+                        
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          
+========================================================+





More information about the macports-users mailing list