uninstalling a selected port ...
Jason Swails
jason.swails at gmail.com
Fri Feb 28 05:44:23 PST 2014
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:33 +0100, Peter Danecek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I observe a behaviour, which I believe is due to the fact that I
> uninstalled an selected port (see below). This seems to leave the
> selection mechanism in an undesired state and should be handled. Now I
> wonder which is the expected behaviour, so that I can eventually file
> a ticket against the right component.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --- snip ---
>
> petr% sudo port select --list postgresql
> Available versions for postgresql:
> none (active)
> postgresql93
>
> petr% sudo port select --set postgresql postgresql93
> Selecting 'postgresql93' for 'postgresql' failed: symlink: /opt/local/etc/select/postgresql/current -> postgresql93: file already exists
Try forcing the issue.
sudo port -f select --set postgresql postgresql93
In my opinion, such protection is a Good Thing (TM). There's a way to
work around it if you know the reason behind the file collision, but I
certainly wouldn't want a program (especially one I run as root) to go
around clobbering existing files without me knowing it.
Hope this helps,
Jason
--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
More information about the macports-users
mailing list