gcc49 vs gcc48

[Brandon Allbery]

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:45 AM, René J.V. <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:

> > That though does not make what I said incorrect. clang 3.4 fully
> > supports c++11. A statement of fact.
>
> Please don't take my statement about C++11 support out of context.
> Relevant earlier thread: "clang++-mp-3.4 doesn't find initializer_list on
> OS X 10.6"


Note that, just as Apple provides the C++ runtime, Apple provides the C++
headers. In both cases, there is a limited ability to substitute others and
you may well break things even more by arbitrarily overriding the system
headers with "fixed" versions --- so no, a MacPorts clang on 10.6 is not
going to override Apple's C++11-deficient headers with its own, since most
people expect it to produce code compatible with Apple-provided libraries.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20141119/6e3b4704/attachment.html>