non-existent variants

[René J.V. Bertin]

On Saturday October 11 2014 00:43:19 Clemens Lang wrote:

> > Is there a reason for this omission?
> 
> Yes:
> 
> Consider ports A -> B -> C -> D, where -> is "depends on".
> 
> A has no variants, B has +foo, C has +bar and D has +baz

Yes, I see. But that situation could also have been addressed by disabling the check through an additional option or env.variable, no?

R.