non-existent variants

René J.V. Bertin rjvbertin at
Fri Oct 10 16:06:14 PDT 2014

On Saturday October 11 2014 00:43:19 Clemens Lang wrote:

> > Is there a reason for this omission?
> Yes:
> Consider ports A -> B -> C -> D, where -> is "depends on".
> A has no variants, B has +foo, C has +bar and D has +baz

Yes, I see. But that situation could also have been addressed by disabling the check through an additional option or env.variable, no?


More information about the macports-users mailing list