non-existent variants

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Oct 10, 2014, at 6:06 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:

> On Saturday October 11 2014 00:43:19 Clemens Lang wrote:
> 
>>> Is there a reason for this omission?
>> 
>> Yes:
>> 
>> Consider ports A -> B -> C -> D, where -> is "depends on".
>> 
>> A has no variants, B has +foo, C has +bar and D has +baz
> 
> Yes, I see. But that situation could also have been addressed by disabling the check through an additional option or env.variable, no?

What do you mean? Disabling what check?