octave-control configure fail

[Mihai Moldovan]

On 05.07.2015 05:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> If octave truly requires a revbump following every gcc upgrade, that's horrible.
> 
> But if that's going to remain the case, then I guess a comment should be added to the top of every affected gcc port reminding us of that.

It hardcodes gfortran's path (and maybe more?) :(

So yes, for everything but a revbump of gcc ports, octave must be revbumped (and
maybe even octave-control.)



Mihai

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 884 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20150705/ee929a08/attachment.sig>