openssl vs. libressl

Daniel J. Luke dluke at geeklair.net
Tue Nov 10 13:20:55 PST 2015


On Nov 10, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Rainer Müller <raimue at macports.org> wrote:
> This would basically cause the same problems as with the current path:
> dependency.

you’re right, of course.

> It is still required to rev-upgrade all ports after switching the
> variant. All binary archives built with the default option would not
> work on a system with a different variant choice on mp-ssl-lib.
> 
> Explicit variants in all ports are the only way to prevent that, as the
> port contents will actually be different depending on whether you link
> against openssl or libressl.

Ryan’s previous suggestion is probably best then, we should choose one or the other as our preferred default and recommend a standard variant to use the alternate.

— 
Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
+========================================================+ 
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |                          
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                          
+========================================================+ 
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          
+========================================================+






More information about the macports-users mailing list