openssl vs. libressl
Daniel J. Luke
dluke at geeklair.net
Tue Nov 10 13:20:55 PST 2015
On Nov 10, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Rainer Müller <raimue at macports.org> wrote:
> This would basically cause the same problems as with the current path:
> dependency.
you’re right, of course.
> It is still required to rev-upgrade all ports after switching the
> variant. All binary archives built with the default option would not
> work on a system with a different variant choice on mp-ssl-lib.
>
> Explicit variants in all ports are the only way to prevent that, as the
> port contents will actually be different depending on whether you link
> against openssl or libressl.
Ryan’s previous suggestion is probably best then, we should choose one or the other as our preferred default and recommend a standard variant to use the alternate.
—
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
| Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
| reflect the opinions of my employer. |
+========================================================+
More information about the macports-users
mailing list