`man groff_char' misbehaving

[Brandon Allbery]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:07 PM, j. van den hoff <veedeehjay at gmail.com>
wrote:

> ah yes, never occured to me tht there might be a man port as well. thank
> you for this solution. regarding "satisfactory": for my personal use, yes
> it is. generally, I'd say no, since it seems osx's man does something
> wrong/non-canonical, no?
>

Probably means Apple ships older groff and newer programs' manpages expect
a newer groff. I've seen a fair number of groff warnings to that extent.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20151118/496b3d79/attachment.html>