Use what arpack & atlas variants for use with octave?
Marius Schamschula
lists at schamschula.com
Sun Nov 6 20:31:36 CET 2016
Murray,
The version of gfortran depends on the version of gcc chosen by the compilers port group (currently gcc5).
On Nov 6, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Murray Eisenberg <murrayeisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Marius Schamschula <lists at schamschula.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Murray Eisenberg <murrayeisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m reinstalling arpack, atlas, and octave during completion of MacPorts migration to macOS Sierra.
>>>
>>> On El Capitan, my installed ports included:
>>>
>>> arpack @3.3.0_3+atlas+gfortran
>>> atlas @3.10.2_2
>>> octave @4.0.3_1+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+qt4gui+sound-accelerate-java
>>>
>>> I began now with:
>>>
>>> sudo port install arpack -accelerate+atlas
>>>
>>> (1) Should I have added +gfortran there, since for octave I’m going to be including variant +gfortran ?
>>>
>>> (2) Is there any particular reason to use a +gccxx variant with atlas?
>>
>> The choice of which version of gfortran is used for arpack should be the same as the version used to build atlas (and for that matter octave).
>>
>> Unfortunately, atlas currently only supports gcc5, not gcc6. See https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52606
>>
>
>
> I don’t understand about “which version of gfortran”: arpack, like octave, offers +gfortran but without any indication of version of gfortran.
> And atlas does not offer any variant (at least directly) of fortran.
>
> ---
> Murray Eisenberg murrayeisenberg at gmail.com
> 503 King Farm Blvd #101 Home (240)-246-7240
> Rockville, MD 20850-6667 Mobile (413)-427-5334
Marius
--
Marius Schamschula
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20161106/d9bfd821/attachment.html>
More information about the macports-users
mailing list