inetutils permissions?

Marius Schamschula lists at
Sat Jul 14 18:02:51 UTC 2018



FYI: I had previously submitted a bug to the maintainer for the abort trap issue, but never heard back from the upstream maintainer.

> On Jul 14, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Bill Cole <macportsusers-20171215 at> wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2018, at 2:09 (-0400), Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> rlogin, rsh, and I think rcp need to be setuid root, because they have to use privileged ports.  But they were installed without the setuid root permission set (they worked normally after setting it by hand).
>> Is there any reason that isn't set as part of installation? Granted it's not without downside, but someone that's using the old r-commands probably isn't too worried about that anyway.
> It looks like this is a bug in the inetutils config/build system. It selects '/usr/bin/install' as the install tool, but does not verify what flavor of 'install' that is, assuming that it will allow GNU 'install' argument ordering. However, that's a BSD-heritage 'install' which does not handle putting the source filename before options, and it breaks. Making things worse, it is a breakage that inetutils is entirely unprepared for, because it assumes that the only way 'install' can fail is a permissions problem.
> I've just submitted a bug to the GNU inetutils maintainer.
> -- 
> Bill Cole
> bill at or billcole at
> (AKA @grumpybozo and many * addresses)
> Currently Seeking Steadier Work:


More information about the macports-users mailing list