Daniel J. Luke
dluke at geeklair.net
Sun May 10 00:47:04 UTC 2020
On May 7, 2020, at 3:34 PM, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.webuse at gmail.com> wrote:
>> there are large closed-source surface areas that you aren't going to be able to keep updated.
> You have said that before, and I listened, but:
> all my systems live behind a firewall, and none are exposed to the open web.
> I don’t use any MacOS-era software to access anything outside the network. Only, really, MacPorts stuff (all with up-to-date security) and TenFourFox (also built with MacPorts stuff, also with all up to date security).
... and they're probably all linked with versions of Libsystem that don't have the most recent patches from Apple (you could probably be backporting them, but I doubt you're doing that :) ).
> I just don’t see the vulnerability, TBH.
> If you know of any, please give me an example. I don’t want to be stupid about things.
It's risky - the majority of bugs that Apple releases security patches for are in components that exist in previous Mac OS versions. Maybe those versions don't have those problems (but they probably do). Maybe no one is exploiting them.
If you are firewalling and monitoring both inbound and outbound traffic, maybe you've set things up so that you can run a vulnerable system safely. Most people aren't capable of doing that. These kinds of things are hard to do well - if you've got a strong perimeter, but vulnerable systems inside - it just takes one problem with your perimeter security and an attacker has access to everything you thought was secured by your perimeter security.
> The time daemon, maybe? I heard there was something about that daemon,
yeah, it's had a bunch of problems.
> but it just checks Apple’s time server.
how do you know? (hint: ntp uses udp and also bgp-interdomain routing is still largely insecure).
> I could replace that too, I guess...
At that point, if you're not using any MacOS software - why are you running Mac OS at all? That hardware can run an OS that's still getting security patches and run all of the unix-y software that's in Macports without the risk.
(Of course, Mac OS UI and hardware drivers are generally better, so I understand there may be reasons why people might want to do this - but I think it's too easy to overlook the potential downside).
[This is probably off-topic for macports, so I'll refrain from typing more]
Daniel J. Luke
More information about the macports-users