OpenMPI Users - Is Anyone Using openmpi-clang33 or openmpi-clang34?

[Chris Jones]

Hi,

I would suggest maybe its worth pruning the gcc list a bit as well ? I believe e.g. gcc7 at least works all the way down to 10.5, perhaps even older ? Do we still need gcc 5, 6?

Chris

> On 7 May 2021, at 1:35 pm, Christopher Nielsen <mascguy at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> We’re considering retirement of ports openmpi-clang33 and openmpi-clang34, to reduce the number of openmpi-* ports we support. At the moment, the list is quite large, and it’s becoming a challenge to thoroughly test and maintain all of these:
> 
> openmpi-clang                  @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang10                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang11                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang33                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang34                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang37                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang50                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang60                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang70                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang80                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-clang90                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-default                @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-gcc5                   @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-gcc6                   @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-gcc7                   @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-gcc8                   @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-gcc9                   @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-gcc10                  @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> openmpi-gcc49                  @4.1.1          science/openmpi
> 
> While we hope to continue supporting as many of these as possible for the foreseeable future, removing two of the oldest Clang versions would allow us to provide more focus on the rest.
> 
> Please let us know if you use the clang33 or clang34 variations, or know anyone who does.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20210507/939c25a3/attachment.htm>