Does the migration procedure keep ports versions?
Dave Horsfall
dave at horsfall.org
Thu Sep 29 21:54:34 UTC 2022
On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, chilli.namesake at gmail.com wrote:
> The initial reported spec, "a High Sierra MBP," is ambiguous. That could
> mean a 2010 MBP, that can be updated up to High Sierra with a third
> party enabler, or more likely Ces VLC meant that the machine's original
> and default OS from Apple was High Sierra, indicating a 2018 model,
> which is still supported by Apple up to current, or Ventura.
Odd; mine is a mid-2010, and I just installed it without an "enabler"
(whatever that is). I do have the occasional problem though, since Sierra
is recommended for this model; I needed HS to run some applications that I
wanted i.e. all the old ones that I installed under Sierra and have
disappeared from the store.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_version_history#Releases
Yes, I think that's the one.
> Anyway, while the names of all the macOS versions are so very cute, they
> inevitably waste my time because I always have to double check the name
> against the actual OS version number, which is the detail that matters.
> Up to Lion, I had them memorized. Since then I have resisted learning
> them all because Apple aggravatingly increased its OS release cycle and
> feature creep to yearly. I honestly wish there were two releases, one
> that included new features, and one that didn't require disabling all
> the unwanted and unnecessary new features.
That is indeed annoying; they must be catering to a certain demographic,
like Penguin/OS. At least FreeBSD sticks to version numbers which I have
no trouble remembering and are easily compared.
-- Dave
More information about the macports-users
mailing list