Keeping local modifications

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Oct 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> This partly goes to the discussion I raised about default revisions  
> of 1:
>
> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2006-October/ 
> 000095.html
>
> But it would be nice for the precedence be done by (version,  
> revision) tuple and not by location of the Portfile, so you can  
> have local modifications be outdated when a new official port comes  
> out.

Except that the new 'official' port (probably) won't have whatever  
local changes in it that were important enough for you to set up a  
local port.

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20061023/08fb7bda/PGP.bin