1.4.1 release

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Apr 10, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>> 	Back again on 1.4.1, if I don't get any feedback within, say, two  
>> days, I'll tag a release candidate based on the current state of  
>> the branch and work my way toward a release from there. Speak up  
>> if you feel there's any glaring omission in the code base.
>
> OK, at the risk of being flamed for having a one-track mind, let me  
> try a slightly different approach to my usual rant:
>
> To ask a counter-question, what would / will the difference between  
> 1.4.1 and ToT tagged and released as of, say, two days ago?  Or  
> even sometime this week?

The global +universal variant, for one. I think the plan is to  
release that with 1.5 (once some more details are figured out).

> I'm not looking for a line by line diff, I am wondering what  
> features or experimental and dangerous code would escape should the  
> latter approach be taken.
>
> It's a legitimate question - I'm not just trying to be annoying,  
> honest.  I don't have to try to be annoying, I can do that  
> naturally. :-)

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20070411/9b932bb7/PGP.bin