Tor and unusual version numbers

Daniel J. Luke dluke at
Thu Apr 26 18:20:24 PDT 2007

On Apr 26, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
> 	IIRC this already came up once but went unresolved. Four digit  
> version numbers are not that common, so this is probably an  
> overlook for that case either in the "get_outdated_ports" tcl proc  
> in port(1) (base/src/port/port.tcl) or in the "rpm_vercomp" C  
> function of the Pextlib library (base/src/pextlib1.0/vercomp.c),  
> used said proc. I'd appreciate it if one of you could search trac  
> for a similar report and put it in the "Needs developer review"  
> milestone if not already there, or file it from scratch if one does  
> not already exist.
> 	Thanks for the report and help! Regards,...

and for the immediate workaround, the port maintainer can bump the  
Daniel J. Luke
| *---------------- dluke at ----------------* |
| *-------------- -------------* |
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :

More information about the macports-dev mailing list