[24922] trunk/dports/PortIndex

[James Berry]

On May 8, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>>> Two of those actually are bad, two of them actually are good.
>>
>> The two good ones have plusses in them (and I thought we weren't  
>> going to have plusses in port names?)
>
> Well, we got 'em now. Now what? Do we rename the two ports or  
> expand the regex?

I exanded the regex to allow + in portnames (r24929), at least until  
something else is decided ;)

James