72 hours are not enough for maintainers?
js
ebgssth at gmail.com
Fri Feb 22 05:58:08 PST 2008
> > I suggest giving non-maintainers the permission to change "Assigned
> > to" field.
>
> It seems to me like that would be a good idea too. But I'm not sure
> what all the implications of that would be.
According to Trac doc[1], if I had TICKET_CHGPROP,
I could modify ticket properties except description field, cc field add/remove.
Who cares if I wrongly change priority, components or version etc.
[1]http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracPermissions
> > Once tickets are properly assigned, all you have to do is to look at
> > "My tickets".
>
> Assuming reporters assign tickets correctly, sure.
That might encourage reporters to open ticket carefully, I hope.
> > In addition to that, How abount sending reminder to macports-dev
> > when there're tickets unchanged more than a few weeks?
> > Trac's backend is RDBMS so checking ticket state should be easy.
>
> I know I have old tickets. Some need planning, some are waiting for
> upstream fixes, some are not very important but are still open
> because they're still unresolved. I don't need lots of emails nagging
> me about these. I have enough of an email problem as it is. Also,
> macports-dev is not a place to send automated emails; it's a place
> for discussing the development of MacPorts. For automated mails we
> have other lists, like macports-changes and macports-tickets.
Just add a update on those tickets.
Reporters would be happy to see their ticket updated.
And you are right. macports-tickets would be better.
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list