Milestoning duplicate tickets?

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Jan 17, 2008, at 23:46, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:

> 	Some of us are clashing on Trac: in one corner, those who keep  
> duplicate tickets and/or set them to appropriate milestones; in the  
> other corner, those (read, only me, I think) who take them out of  
> milestones when encountering them.
>
> 	The way I see it, if the ticket is a duplicate of an "original"  
> one, and said original is already properly milestoned, then what's  
> the benefit of also having the duplicate in the same milestone? And  
> if said original is *not* properly milestoned, then it should be ;-)
>
> 	But that's of course only one side of the ring. What does the  
> other side have to say about it?

Why shouldn't all tickets (even duplicate tickets) have the correct  
milestone?