Milestoning duplicate tickets?

[William Siegrist]

I agree with Ryan, but are you also saying you also keep them "open"?  
Is there a reason for having multiple tickets open for the same issue?

-Bill




On Jan 17, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>
> On Jan 17, 2008, at 23:46, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>
>> 	Some of us are clashing on Trac: in one corner, those who keep  
>> duplicate tickets and/or set them to appropriate milestones; in the  
>> other corner, those (read, only me, I think) who take them out of  
>> milestones when encountering them.
>>
>> 	The way I see it, if the ticket is a duplicate of an "original"  
>> one, and said original is already properly milestoned, then what's  
>> the benefit of also having the duplicate in the same milestone? And  
>> if said original is *not* properly milestoned, then it should be ;-)
>>
>> 	But that's of course only one side of the ring. What does the  
>> other side have to say about it?
>
> Why shouldn't all tickets (even duplicate tickets) have the correct  
> milestone?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev




----
William Siegrist
Software Support Engineer
Mac OS Forge
http://macosforge.org/
wsiegrist at apple.com
408 862 7337





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2421 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20080117/ea1788df/smime.bin