jeremy at lavergne.gotdns.org
Tue Jul 14 03:12:25 PDT 2009
I'd suggest using the HTML 5 doctype so it's ready to go in the
future, but essentially using HTML 4.01 transitional.
On Jul 14, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I have not kept up with the developments of HTML 5 except for the
> canvas tag. Is there a specific feature of HTML 5 you believe we
> should be using on the MacPorts web site, or are you just talking
> about changing the doctype? Would changing the doctype to HTML 5's
> give us better browser compatibility than we have now? I thought we
> were pretty much as good as we could get now with the XHTML 1.1
> doctype, though dropping back to XHTML 1.0 transitional or even HTML
> 4.01 wouldn't be out of the question. www.apple.com and www.macosforge.org
> both use HTML 4.01 today.
> #20278 was due to an inexplicable issue on the user's end that
> reformatted and changed the source code of our web site, breaking
> it; nothing we can do to fix that.
> #14062 was due to Internet Explorer not handling XHTML documents
> served with the correct content type, so we fixed it by serving the
> incorrect content type to IE only.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2435 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the macports-dev