[129844] trunk/dports/multimedia/audacious-plugins/Portfile

[Joshua Root]

On 2014-12-23 04:35 , Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 22.12.2014 06:18 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> If I see a port foo at 1.2.3+bar, I should not have to wonder whether there is
>> also a foo at 1.2.3, or whether the no-variant version is foo at 1.2.5 or
>> whatever.
> 
> My case here is very much more simple.
> 
> Revbumping the whole audacious-plugins port would lead to useless rebuilds for
> those not having the ffmpeg variant enabled. Even though one could state that
> +ffmpeg is the default if +sdl2 wasn't selected (which it is not, by default)
> and a "global" revbump would *maybe* have little overhead (i.e., affects only a
> small number of -ffmpeg installations.)

Does the port in fact show up as outdated for people who have it
installed with the rev-bumped variant?

- Josh