GitHub desired workflow...
jeremy at lavergne.me
Mon Oct 31 14:03:52 PDT 2016
You can `pull -r` immediately before pushing. Conveniently, you can
configure pull to autorebase. Either way, the simplest modification to
your last step is this:
git pull -r && git push
On 10/31/2016 05:01 PM, Eric A. Borisch wrote:
> Thanks for all the hard work with this transition! I'm sure once we're
> all "over the hump" we'll look back and wonder why we waited so long.
> Just so I'm clear on this, is the desired approach for each committer to:
> == setup ==
> 1) clone macports/macports-ports to the local filesystem
> == every change ==
> 2) make changes
> 3) 'add' changes
> 4) 'commit' changes
> 5) 'push' changes (to macports-ports)
> Oh, and and to capture upstream changes, somewhere after 1 and before 5
> (4? 3?),
> a) git fetch
> b) git rebase origin/master
> It looks like git pull --rebase does both of those, so that's not too bad.
> If I'm wrong, or if I've missed something, please let me know; there's
> been more discussion than I've had time to follow of late surrounding
> this transition...
More information about the macports-dev