GSoC Proposal

[Mojca Miklavec]

Dear Karan,

you may put such statistics and suggestions for action plans in the
proposal (or appendix to proposal).

What about pypackage -> py-pypackage? (I miss such entries on the list,
unless those are the ones you intentionally didn't count.)
Did you ignore capitalisation of names?

Mojca

On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 22:51, KARAN SHETH <karan.sheth at somaiya.edu> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> Just to see how many ports will we have to rename if we take on this
> path I ran a quick script and following were the results:
>
> PyPI Name        Macports Name        Number
>
> package             package                   10
>
> package             py-package               769
>
> package             py-pypackage            1
>
> pypackage         py-package                14
>
> --------------          unclassified                30
>
> Total PyPI Ports = 824
>
> So according to this results it would be best to name all the PyPI as
> py-package.
>
> Note: The script might be a bit off.
>
> Thanks,
> Karan Sheth
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20190402/f9b7348e/attachment-0001.html>