pgf: objections to removing?

[Eric Gallager]

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 7:07 AM Dan Ports <dports at macports.org> wrote:

> The pgf port installs a latex package that would otherwise be in
> texlive-pictures. It's been a separate port mostly for historical
> reasons -- it predates our texlive ports.
>
> This port used to be maintained. It's a nomaintainer port now, but
> people have still been keeping it up to date.
>
> I'd just as soon add pgf back into texlive-pictures in the next update,
> and replace the port so we have one less thing to maintain. Anyone feel
> strongly one way or the other?
>

I have pgf installed currently, but if it's just going to be made part of
texlive-pictures then it should be ok since it'll still be available, just
as part of a different port


>
> Dan
>
> --
> Dan R. K. Ports                                      https://drkp.net/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20200711/d97da462/attachment.htm>