pre-built quartz variant packages
Sergio Had
vital.had at gmail.com
Sun Jan 14 16:08:34 UTC 2024
AFAIK ports are only being pre-built with the default variant.
GTK should be trivial to build though.
On Jan 14, 2024 at 23:58 +0800, Valerio Messina via macports-dev <macports-dev at lists.macports.org>, wrote:
> I'm not sure this is the right list to ask for pre-built macports.
>
> In case can you please direct me to the right one?
>
> thank you,
> Valerio
>
>
> On 12/5/23 10:47 PM, Valerio Messina via macports-dev wrote:
> > hi,
> > as a user of osxcross, I also use the good of macports.
> > I read that is not your main target, but tolerate cross-built from other
> > OS. I'm on Debian.
> >
> > I saw there are pre-built packages here:
> > https://packages.macports.org/
> > and this is where the 'osxcross-macport' get the packages.
> >
> > Native macport client has support for variants with something like:
> > $ port variants <pkg> # show package variants
> > $ port install <pkg> +<var1> -<var2> # install variant1, not variant2
> >
> > I saw on packages.macports.org there are only X11 packages, and seems
> > native quartz variant are missing.
> > So for example for gtk3-devel:
> > https://ports.macports.org/port/gtk3-devel/details/
> > is available for X11 backend only as pre-built for foreign OS.
> >
> > Is there a reason for this?
> >
> > Having native quartz pre-built packages will help developer to target
> > quartz instead of xquartz, without the need to (cross)build the GTK
> > itself. This is so for other library with variants.
> >
> > As now the bash script 'osxcross-macport' do not support variants, but
> > I'm sure can be easily upgraded if packages server will host quartz
> > variants.
> >
> > thank you for explanation and work,
>
>
> --
> Valerio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20240115/8432e1cd/attachment.htm>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list