Problem creating RPM Binary Packages that work..
johnnypuffs at gmail.com
Tue Aug 24 00:58:21 PDT 2010
That is what I was hoping was not the case.
Are the Macports not just packaged from source files for easy OS X install?
I thought it would work somehow..
Bummer. It would be great.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH <allbery at kf8nh.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 8/24/10 02:57 , John Puffs wrote:
> > From the documentation it seems that the purpose of creating a Binary
> > Package is to install on another system, not having Macports.
> Yes. Another *Mac* without MacPorts installed. Darwin / OSX Mach-O
> executables won't run on Linux, and Linux ELF executables won't run on
> Darwin or OSX, regardless of whether MacPorts is involved or not. This is
> what the RPM dependency means.
> - --
> brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery at kf8nh.com
> system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
> electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the macports-users