Dovecot port changes
Gerben Wierda
gerben.wierda at rna.nl
Sat Feb 22 12:00:11 UTC 2020
Follow-up suggestion:
Clone port dovecot2 to a new port dovecot1 now
Whenever dovecot major release 3 appears:
Clone the existing dovecot to new port dovecot2
Update dovecot port to dovecot 3
Is there a mechanism in MacPorts to block automatic update activations when new versions of software require a different configuration and automatic conversion is not possible? Should there be one?
> On 22 Feb 2020, at 12:41, Gerben Wierda <gerben.wierda at rna.nl> wrote:
>
> port dovecot is now installing dovecot 2
> port dovecot2 is now installing dovecot 1
>
> The change breaks ‘port update outdated’ as the existence of a dovecot2 install will prevent the installation of dovecot which now has become a dependency for other ports instead of dovecot2. dovecot2-sive is likewise replaced by dovecot-sieve with identical issues.
>
> The only luck I have now is that the update failed so my existing dovecot2 is still running and I can thus I can still read mail (including replies to this).
>
> Yes, making sure that the port dovecot installs dovecot 2 (current) is cleaner (letting port dovecot2 install dovecot 1 is bad). But is that worth this mess? Instead of a nice and simple update, I have (unexpectedly, if I had known I could have prepared) to figure out the new setup, variants, etc. And given that the upgrade failed halfway, I have a messed up MacPorts landscape and I (unexpectedly) have to spend (unplanned) time on this. Spending time on it is not the problem. Unexpected, because of a strictly sproken unnecessary cosmetic change, is.
>
> G
More information about the macports-users
mailing list