suddenly, "-arch i386" is added and all fails: e.g. libsdl (dosbox is i386 only)

[Dominik Reichardt]

As I was one of those with in depth view on DOSBox and previously adamant on leaving it on i386:

- the best 64bit support, meaning the fastest, is in current SVN of DOSBox. The 0.74-3 release is ok but very slow.

- IMHO, do NOT use the fork of DOSBox for SDL2 unless that particular branch is adding *only* SDL2 stuff. Otherwise it brings many more enhancements that might clash eventually with the goals of DOSBox itself.

> On 7. Mar 2020, at 17:49, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.webuse at gmail.com <mailto:ken.cunningham.webuse at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> I just updated the dosbox and dosbox-sld2 ports in my personal repo to the latest versions
> 
> please feel free to give them a try. they work for me
> 
> if they work well enough for everyone, I can move them over into the main macports repo.
> 
> <https://github.com/kencu/macports-ports/tree/dosboxup/emulators/dosbox <https://github.com/kencu/macports-ports/tree/dosboxup/emulators/dosbox>>

> On 7. Mar 2020, at 17:49, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.webuse at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I just updated the dosbox and dosbox-sld2 ports in my personal repo to the latest versions
> 
> please feel free to give them a try. they work for me
> 
> if they work well enough for everyone, I can move them over into the main macports repo.
> 
> <https://github.com/kencu/macports-ports/tree/dosboxup/emulators/dosbox>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20200307/0f878829/attachment.html>