Recently added port source was removed

[Austin Ziegler]

More of a development question, but when there's a known broken build such
as the arm64 issue (the binary hangs and never returns, requiring a kill
-9), is there a way in a Portfile to indicate that the arch is (at least
temporarily) unsupported?

-a

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:33 PM Austin Ziegler <halostatue at gmail.com> wrote:

> The recently added (June 1) port `just-fast` was formerly at
> github.com/GiuseppeCesarano/just-fast, which now is 404.
>
> There appears to be no replacement or reason given for its disappearance.
> This could be that the repo was made private or deleted, but the wayback
> machine only records the repo as late as 2022, before issue 16 mentioned in
> the Portfile (noting that arm64 was broken, which is why I started looking
> at this).
>
> I’d open a ticket, but I’m not really sure what exactly I’d be reporting
> (broken arm64 is known, but now there appears to be no way to possibly
> *fix* the issue without a source repo).
>
> -a
> --
> Austin Ziegler • halostatue at gmail.com • austin at halostatue.ca
> http://www.halostatue.ca/ • http://twitter.com/halostatue
>


-- 
Austin Ziegler • halostatue at gmail.com • austin at halostatue.ca
http://www.halostatue.ca/ • http://twitter.com/halostatue
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20240724/ee8d9e54/attachment.htm>